Perbincangan pengguna:On Wheezier Plot/Arkib/2nd

Perbualan Terkini!

Kandungan Semua Arkib Perbincangan Saya Yang Lepas
Arkib yang Pertama: 2006AD sehingga 2007AD

You are being funny

Hi there,

• How long you have been in WIKI family? If you have been for long you should have known how you should talk when you edit other articles.
• Secondly, I may be new in here but I am not silly like your sarcastic remarks. It just reflects who you are.
• Third, why you removed the reference to Wikipedia and Commons? Because you want to show your power? Do some research, BOY!!
• Fourth, if this is the way you want to “RULE” Malay Wiktionary, well done because this site will die soon. You should brush up your manners and also look at other's Wiktionaries too. What’s do and what’s don’t.
• Fifth, I know you're still young but being young doesn’t grant you any rights to treat people with silly remarks, what are you? Some expert? Since you called me “amateur”!
• Well done to your welcome edit remark! You just show to people who you are!
• I just checked your profile in Wikipedia.. Wow, I am not surprised to see how people WARNED you a lot about the way you leave your remarks.. What to do, once a devil, will forever be! -- Whjayg 15:04, 18 Januari 2008 (UTC)

I undo all your edits. Enough said - Whjayg 09:19, 22 Januari 2008 (UTC)

Walaupun saya tidak suka bercerita banyak, namun saya rasa saya perlu memberitahu anda mengenai perkara-perkara di bawah:

• Apa itu navigation template? Navigation template merujuk kepada rencana berkaitan dan tidak pernah diHARAMkan di dalam kumpulan Wikimedia. Walaupun templat Wikisister telah wujud, namun isinya adalah kurang dan merujuk kepada “rencana” lema sahaja, oleh itu tidak salah bagi penulis untuk meletakkan isi yang lain tanpa mengubah templat sebenar. Untuk maklumat lanjut sila rujuk WikiProject mana-mana rencana termasuk Wiki Projeck Opera di dalam ke-dua-dua bahasa. Sila faham bahawa navigation templat adalah senarai rencana-rencana berkaitan. Jikalau anda bercerita tentang keseragaman, kebiasaannya setiap “Projek” mempunyai cara tersendiri dan menyeragamkan kesemua rencana-rencana di bawah seliaan projek tersebut.

• Anda dengan bangganya membuang “Templat:WikiProjek” dari laman perbualan dan meninggalkan message untuk saya merujuk kepada panduan WikiProjek. Saya dengan bangganya menyuruh anda membaca sendiri.

• Anda juga dengan bangganya meletakkan “templat selamat datang” dari anda dengan tandatangan yang sungguh BESAR di laman perbualan saya. Apabila saya padam, anda letak semula. “Templat” itu boleh dipadam oleh pengguna dan saya padam kerana saya rasa andalah yang perlu memahami konsep “berkerjasama dan saling hormat menghormati”.

• Saya tidak kisah apabila pengguna lain membetulkan kesalahan saya atau edit rencana saya, tetapi kenapa saya sungguh ambil perhatian apabila anda yang buat? Ianya kerana anda tidak menghormati pengguna lain dan dalam masa yang sama tindakan anda boleh dipertikaikan. Anda bukan sahaja tidak suka berbincang tetapi meninggalkan mesej-mesej yang boleh membuatkan pengguna baru tawar hati untuk menyumbang. Sungguh malang di pihak anda, saya bukan pengguna baru dan saya menulis untuk membantu rakan-rakan yang lain menambahkan rencana-rencana di bahagian bahasa Melayu.

• Flooding edit: Tidakkah anda tahu bahawa tindakan anda ini salah? Saya baca laman perbualan anda di sini dan juga di WIKI EN, nampaknya anda jenis yang tidak mendengar nasihat orang lain. Seperti yang banyak kali diberitahu kepada anda “Sila tekan butang PREVIEW atau PRATONTON” sebelum SIMPAN.

• Edit keterlaluan: Anda dilihat seperti amat suka menyunting sehingga anda menyunting perbualan orang lain, kenapa? Sekira seseorang berbincang dengan saya untuk menukar “navigation template” atau template atau lain-lain yang saya buat, saya sudi berbincang untuk mencari jalan terbaik. Namun anda bukanlah orang yang sesuai untuk dibawa berbincang.

Saya terpaksa memberitahu anda bahawa, suntingan anda amat tidak dialu-alukan sehingga anda belajar erti berkerjasama, berbincang dan menghormati penulis-penulis lain. Tidak perlu reply kepada saranan saya ini dan tolong hentikan edit anda yang tidak perlu itu dari lema-lema saya - Whjayg 12:32, 22 Januari 2008 (UTC)

Jangan sunting komen orang lain

Tolong jangan sunting komen orang lain. "Bantuan" anda tidak dialu-alukan. ...Aurora... 11:17, 22 Januari 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. That is very distraughting of you! ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 20:28, 31 Januari 2008 (UTC)

Anda diminta datang mengundi

Mengikut hemat saya anda dirasakan layak mengundi di wikibooks untuk permohonan Edmundwoods untuk menjadi penyelia sementara. Anda hanya mengundi mengikut perasaan anda terhadap dia di Wikikamus Melayu kerana dia meminta tugas kepenyeliaan di Wikibuku Melayu hanya untuk mengemas kini, memperbetul serta pelbagai lagi tugas kepenyeliaan. Dia akan mengambil alih tugas kepenyeliaan di WikiBuku Melayu buat sementara waktu kerana penyelia sedia ada agak sibuk didalam dunia sebenar. Sila datang ke sini. PuteraLuqman ^{Tunku Andre}09:03, 20 Februari 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 06:51, 21 Februari 2008 (UTC)

E-mel Wiktionary

Note/Perhatian: This message shown below was sent and delivered through an electronic mail.

Adakah anda perasan yang sepatutnya kepenyeliaan ke atas Aurora dan Yosri sebenarnya sudah pun tamat pada 1 Februari 2008. Ini bermaksud 20 hari yang lalu!!! Rujuk ini http://ms.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Penyelia. Saya rasa ini peluang baik anda untuk menjadi penyelia. Mula-mula anda mohon ke Meta-Wiki atas sebagai temporary adminship sambil meletakkan request anda utk jadi penyelia disini http://ms.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Penyelia/Permohonan. Selepas itu anda menghantarkan pula usul bahawa tugas kepenyeliaan Yosri dan Aurora dah pun tamat. Idea saya supaya anda menjadi Temporary Sysop untuk supaya semua orang fikir itu adalah masa percubaan. Selepas itu anda mengusulkan pula request for Regular Adminship. Saya rasa anda mempunyai peluang yang besar untuk menjadi peyelia dan anda sememamngnya rajin membangun MsWikitionary. Just opinion PuteraLuqman ^{Tunku Andre}16:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 16:31, 2 Januari 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday Peter. ;) Putera Luqman Tunku Andre 12:47, 3 Mac 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. Happy Birthday, Daniel! ;-) ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 16:33, 2 Januari 2009 (UTC)

NOTE: The following discussion was retrieved from the Request for Deletion's Project Page from the English Wiktionary where it was originally held and it took place precisely on the 1st of April, 2008^AD, Tuesday starting at 00:04 ante meridiem (Universal Time Coordinated). The core objective for it is to be an archived question-and-answer talk section about whether or not should a common noun word entry id est new year be deleted due to its sum of parts. Therefore, please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made outside this archived discussion box. In other words, no further edits should be made into this section of On Wheezier Plot's talk page. Thank you.

new year

Suspected sum of parts. --Ivan Štambuk 00:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly with just the current definition, but it is also used in phrases like "What are you doing at new year?" where it means the new year celebrations, or a period of time ranging from new year's eve to the period between about the 29th or 30th of December to about the 2nd or 3rd of January (or a smaller portion thereof). Also, "What are you doing for new year" means "how are you celebrating the new year" not "what are your plans for the following year?". --Thryduulf 00:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps that's a U.K. thing? Nearly all of your examples sound odd to me; I'd say "New Year's" instead. --Ruakh_TALK 01:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

"New Year" and "New Year's" are used pretty much interchangeably in the UK for all the examples I gave. --Thryduulf 01:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

But is it ever in lower case? That would seem to be the critical question here. --Visviva 12:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Looks like sum of parts to me (UK). --SemperBlotto 07:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

A survey of Google web and books suggests that "new month," "new decade" etc. are also widely used. new day should have an entry, but unless non-compositional usage is shown, new year and any others of this type should be deleted (without prejudice to New Year). BTW, this means that we need to add a sense to new (or at least rewrite one of the existing ones); the "current/later" definition doesn't quite fit. --Visviva 08:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Strong Keep. Is solar system merely a sum of parts for Solar System? Are tropic and tropics the cloned entries of Tropic and Tropics respectively? These are just the tip of the iceberg from the many other pairs which I had found from this English Wiktionary that seems to deserve both uppercase and lowercase titles of the same word as legitimate word entries. Ironically and however, why not for this one? Vice versa, why not solar system, tropic, and tropics be gone deleted if they are as similar as or regarded as the sum of parts for Solar System, Tropic, and Tropics correspondingly? Secondly, below these are some of my research that apparently advocates the definition differences of the lowercase common noun new year and the uppercase proper noun New Year:

Results for "New Year"

(noun)

1. the first day or days of the calendar year.
2. (initial capital letters) the first day or few days of a year in any of various calendars.
3. See New Year’s Day.
4. first few days of year: the first day or first few days of a calendar year.
5. the calendar year about to start or recently started.
6. usually New Year's: NEW YEAR'S DAY
7. the first days of a calendar year.
8. ROSH HASHANAH
9. (capital) the first day or several days of a year.
10. The first few days of a calendar year.
11. In particular, January 1 in the Julian calendar, Julian and Gregorian calendar, Gregorian calendars, calendar and the days following.
12. of or relating to New Year (rfv-sense, as adjective: is this valid or should it be considered a misspelling of New Year's?)

Results for "new year"

(noun)

1. the year approaching or newly begun.

   Chiefly British, a handsel is a gift to express good wishes at the beginning of a new year or enterprise.

2. the calendar year just begun.
3. next year: the year following the current year, especially the early part of it.
4. the calendar year just begun or about to begin.
5. the period immediately before and after 31 December.
6. a year that has recently begun or will soon begin.
7. \new"-year`\ (adjective) Of or pertaining to, or suitable for, the commencement of the year; as, new-year gifts or odes.

60.50.9.94 09:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, it does meet the lemming test, which is good enough for me, since I do not favor a high burden of proof for anything as vague as "idiomaticity." Weak keep. Note however that the Webster's 1913 cite would actually apply to new-year, a (potential) separate entry. Also, as I have understood it, the sum-of-parts argument is that the current definition is the sum of new and year. "New year" couldn't be sum-of-parts from New Year, because New Year is not a part of "new year," and different capitalizations almost always deserve separate entries. However, it has not been shown that "new year" is ever used to mean "New Year," except perhaps by e.e. cummings and his latter-day followers on Usenet. --Visviva 12:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Weak keep. While new can theoretically appear before any of several time-unit words, its usage this way seems to be limited to new year and new day. Each of these caries connotation beyond the sum of the parts in a way that new month, new week, or new fortnight just don't do. --EncycloPetey 15:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep. I am not quite sure whether such entry should be measured or judged by the number of various dictionaries which they have it as criteria. But by the look of what links to that page seems to increase gradually (from five pages when it was first proposed for deletion until seven today apart from this page), such as the Finnish term uusi vuosi and it might be used for a little proof. Otherwise it would end up in Special:WantedPages as an unwanted page if deleted despite disabled. On the other hand, it is not surprising to note that this common noun was nominated into here on April the First since the "new year" is given credence to the most common explanation for the origin of April Fools' Day. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 23:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Kept. —msh210℠ 19:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

References, citations, or footnotes

NOTE: The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made outside this archived discussion box but within this user's talk page itself. No further edits should be made into this section.

NOTE: The following discussion was retrieved from the Main Page's Talk Page from the English Wiktionary where it was originally held and it took place precisely on the 5th April, 2008^AD, Saturday starting at 10:00 post meridiem (Universal Time Coordinated). The core objective for it is to be an archived question-and-answer talk section about our Malay Wiktionary's milestones, its compliments, and its requests. Therefore, please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made outside this archived discussion box. In other words, no further edits should be made into this section of On Wheezier Plot's talk page. Thank you.

The Malay Wiktionary has just surpassed 1,000 entries today!

The Malay Wiktionary has now more than 1,000 pages, shouldn't it be moved to the 1,000+ section? ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 22:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Moved up, congratulations! - ^theDaveRoss 22:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Gee, thanks a lot! :-) ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 17:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

NOTE: The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made outside this archived discussion box but within this user's talk page itself. No further edits should be made into this section.

Re: Selamat datang

Hello On Wheezier Plot, thanks for your welcome. Best regards. --Jatrobat 23:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. Yeah, thanks to you too! :-) ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 21:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Thanks - I am just here to revert vandalism and spam when I see it (see my userpage). Mike.lifeguard | ^@meta 11:10, 30 Julai 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:41, 7 Ogos 2008 (UTC)

Please respect other people's anonymity

Lama tak jumpa. Tak kira itu memang nama sebenar orang itu atau tidak, tolong jangan panggil orang itu dengan nama sebenar. Kami ada hak kami untuk pakai nama palsu untuk melindungi identiti sendiri, dulu saya tanya Aurora sama ada pengguna ini juga dia, dia enggan jawab lalu kata "adakah identiti saya penting?". Terima kasih. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 21:49, 28 Ogos 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in a few of my edit summaries not long ago. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 07:33, 18 Disember 2008 (UTC)

Forget about what it has passed, since it has been such a long long time you do not interact with Aurora. Time to forgive her (expecially you're a Christian). --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 17:02, 29 Ogos 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in a few of my edit summaries not long ago. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 07:34, 18 Disember 2008 (UTC)

Don't have to bother whether Aurora has forgiven you. Just do what a Christian should do! You may have your own philosophy but you still have to respect all of us who choose to hide our real name - some of us do so for personal security. I don't believe that is Aurora's real name - I remember you've told me how you got it! --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 18:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in a few of my edit summaries not long ago. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 07:34, 18 Disember 2008 (UTC)

If you don't get ready to forgive it then you can never expect it to forgive you first. At least make the move yourself! If it still refuses to forgive you then let it face The Judgement maybe. Furthermore since it has been a long time both of you never communicate then I assume there is no more problem. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 18:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in a few of my edit summaries not long ago. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 07:35, 18 Disember 2008 (UTC)

Laman pengguna

Selepas ini tolong jangan beri Templat:laman pengguna kepada mana-mana pengguna yg laman penggunanya tidak wujud. Tapak web lain tidak akan menyalin laman yang tiada isi. Anda cuma menyemakkan pangkalan data dan perubahan terkini tanpa sebarang faedah. ...Aurora... 10:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in a few of my edit summaries just not long ago as well as into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 09:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Sebabnya saya dah tuliskan sebelum ini. Projek lain pun tak buat macam ini. Tindakan anda boleh diumpamakan sebagai spam. Sebagai penyelia, saya akan tegur anda bila saya rasa patut. Dan satu lagi, sedarkah anda yg anda telahpun melanggar polisi privasi/gangguan? ...Aurora... 10:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 09:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Saya tak kisah kalau anda sekadar ingin menambah templat pada laman yg dah ada isi. Tetapi anda mencipta laman baru semata-mata untuk meletakkan templat. Buatlah di projek manapun, akan dikira sebagai spam. Kalau bukan spam pun ia akan dianggap laku musnah dan dihapuskan.

Mengenai privasi, dah lupa ke? Itu nama kedua yg anda gunakan untuk memanggilnya. Sebelum ini anda pernah gunakan nama penuh. Periksalah sumbangan anda. Tak kira nama pertama atau nama penuh, kedua-duanya tetap salah. Memang inikah sikap anda? Dah dibuktikan salah pun masih tidak mahu mengaku salah. ...Aurora... 10:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Again I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Jika anda tidak faham apa yg saya cakap, anda mungkin mahu berfikir sekali lagi atau tanya pendapat orang lain. Laman pengguna dicipta untuk pengguna itu sendiri, bukan untuk orang lain. Saya ulangi sekali lagi, saya tiada masalah jika anda ingin menambah templat itu pada laman pengguna yg sudah wujud, bukannya mencipta laman itu semata-mata untuk meletakkan templat. Templat selamat datang memang untuk pengguna sedia ada meletakkannnya kepada pengguna baru. Jadi memang perlu cipta laman baru. Faham? Berkenaan privasi, anda tidak mahu mengaku salah dengan mengatakan saya tidak pernah mengaku salah. Alasan budak-budak. :) ...Aurora... 12:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Not only alasan budak-budak but also quite unchristian. LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 15:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in some of my edit summaries somewhere in the second half of September last year. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 22:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I know we are all sinners but it doesn't mean that you can just simply don't care. Non-Christians used to have the impression that we are all good people, so, especially Aurora is a Muslim I think, then show Aurora that we Christians are really good people. If you know you are a sinner, repent! Your believe must have both the grace and the truth, don't be like those in the "gay churches" where there is only grace but without truth. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 17:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in some of my edit summaries somewhere in the second half of September last year. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 22:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you please just try not to continue fighting with Aurora!? [1] I don't see the problems in the past can be solved in this way, there was supposed to be no problem in these few months, but you insist to fight, see what happened now! By the way, I didn't mean you're gay, my main point is the faith, not the homosexuality issue. --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 13:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in some of my edit summaries somewhere in the second half of September last year. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 23:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm talking about Christian faith! What faith are you talking about!? --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 06:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it in some of my edit summaries somewhere in the second half of September last year. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 23:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Bahasa Melayu

You've got a message! :-) --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 10:24, 1 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 07:14, 2 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Anda dijemput menjadi ahli projek

Note/Perhatian: This message shown below was sent and delivered into my talk page from the Malay Wikipedia.

Hai On Wheezier Plot, anda dijemput menjadi ahli projek WP:RUWM. Lihat perbincangannya. Pengguna lain mencadangkan awak ikut Rapat Umum. Salam Lebaran! ...Muhraz... (bincang) 10:16, 1 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. Unless you want to inform me that you are very habitual in Malay, I will communicate with you in English henceforth. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:42, 2 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I don't think Aurora will join the Rapat Umum. As we can see how it protects its own identity! --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 18:53, 3 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 08:43, 5 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, pray for it. :-P --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 19:02, 4 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Setakat ini RUWM tertangguh kerana bukan waktu yang sesuai untuk mengadakannya (peperiksaan akhir bagi kebanyakan pengguna sedang menghampiri), tetapi kami berharap anda dapat sertai RUWM1. Kurniasan 09:51, 5 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:24, 6 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Penyelia

Anda tidak ingin menjadi penyelia? Kerana saya lihat cuma anda yang aktif di dalam WikiKamus ini. Kalau ada apa-apa boleh rujuk kepada saudara. Kurniasan 04:26, 5 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page, for the very first time ever to you! :-) ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 08:50, 5 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Sebenarnya sekarang cuma ada seorang penyelia. Saudara Yosri telah tidak menyumbang lebih dari tiga bulan (suntingan terakhir pada Januari 2008) dan layak dilucutkan jawatan. Pengguna yang paling giat menyunting adalah anda, dan anda sentiasa berada di sini. Maka anda memang layak, dari segi suntingan dan kehadiran. Mengenai polisi, rasa-rasanya Wikt tidak mempunyai polisi yang serumit Wikipedia memandangkan ini adalah kamus dan tesaurus sahaja. Cuma masalahnya, anda mungkin kurang mengetahui selok-belok Wiktionary dan MediaWiki, tetapi tidak mengapa, saya juga tidak mengetahui apa-apa semasa saya mula menjadi penyelia di Wikipedia Bugis, semuanya boleh dipelajari. Tambahan lagi ada ramai penyelia serta bekas penyelia Wikipedia di sini anda boleh ajukan soalan pada bila-bila masa. Tentang mengusulkan anda sebagai penyelia saya boleh lakukan jika anda bersetuju. Tetapi sebelum itu, anda kena uruskan kematangan saudara. Kurniasan 09:47, 5 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:28, 6 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Hello?

I was quite puzzled today to receive a message in my email today. It has your user page linked, but I do not know if you sent it or it was something else. I do not know any of this language, and I don't remember visiting this Wiktionary, but I will try to help if you need me to. Please explain in English, and please reply here. --Dvortygirl 06:06, 7 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 21:19, 8 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I think I figured out what happened here. I probably looked in to see something and the Single Unified Login created an account for me. Then you saw it and welcomed me and something automatically sent me a notification that I had a message. Anyway, I'm not worried about it, and I don't think either of us has to do anything else. Cheers! --Dvortygirl 04:11, 17 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 09:47, 17 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Sahutan saya mengenai "Laman pengguna".

Hoi? Macam tu ke anda menyapa orang? Anda tanya kenapa saya tak beritahu anda mengenai lencongan laman pengguna. Anda tak beritahu pun anda ingin berbuat demikian. Saya bukan peramal dan saya tidak dapat membaca minda anda. Mengenai 3 orang yang pernah menyumbang itu, itu syarat sampingan. Syarat utama tak dipenuhi lagi buat nak cakap pasal syarat sampingan? Akhir kata, cekur jerangau ada lagi di ubun-ubun. ...Aurora... 11:23, 9 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 21:13, 10 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Ada faedah ke saya terus membalas percakapan anda? Macam mencurah air di daun keladi. Saya sudah jelaskan tindakan saya, terpulanglah jika anda mahu menerimanya atau tidak. Cuma yang lawaknya, anda menyoal saya, kemudian menyembunyikan jawapannya. ...Aurora... 10:34, 13 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 08:55, 20 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Saya dah kata, biar pengguna itu sendiri cipta laman penggunanya, anda tidak perlu "membantu" menciptanya sama ada dengan meletak templat, melencongkannya atau lain-lain. Mengenai nasihat, saya sudah menjalankan tanggungjawab saya, jika anda lebih suka saya mengambil tindakan lain, sesal kemudian tiada berguna. ...Aurora... 09:58, 20 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:13, 28 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Saya setuju. Lebih baik anda memfaedahkan masa itu untuk membuat sumbangan yang lebih berguna. :-) --אדמוןד ואודס_{自分の投稿記録} 10:36, 20 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 19:46, 20 Oktober 2008 (UTC)

Suntingan anda

Saya rasa anda terlalu kerap menyunting sesebuah laman dan menyimpan setiap kali anda melakukan suntingan kecil. Kenapa anda berbuat demikian? Kurniasan 09:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 20:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Saya tidak kisah tentang bilangan suntingan, yang saya kisah tentang sejarah laman. Walaupun saya pengguna baru di sini, saya telah lama menyunting di Wikipedia. Tapi mungkin lebih awal daripada anda. Satu lagi, apabila anda membuat suntingan pada satu-satu laman dengan kerap, ini akan mempengaruhi perubahan terkini. Sesetengah orang bergantung kepada perubahan terkini untuk memantau perubahan pada laman perbincangan (bukan semua orang mahu pantau semua laman yang dia sunting). Saya termasuk dalam golongan ini. Jangan pentingkan keselesaan sendiri, pentingkan juga keselesaan orang lain. Wiktionary adalah milik semua orang, tiada siapa yang lebih elit dsb. Tentang membazir masa membuat suntingan besar dalam sekali simpan, kita anggap anda menyunting dalam masa x untuk setiap kali sunting, dan kita anggap t sebagai masa anda untuk menunggu setiap suntingan anda disimpan (dan juga sedikit masa yg anda ambil untuk membuka tab baru dan buka laman yang anda ingin sunting) serta T sebagai jumlah masa. Katakan anda membuat 10 suntingan untuk satu laman dan anda menyimpan suntingan anda untuk setiap suntingan. Maka T = 10x + 10t = 10(x + t). Sekarang bandingkan dengan anda membuat 10 suntingan dan sekali simpan, T = 10x + t. Kalau anda seorang yang bijak anda tahu mana satu yang lebih membazir masa.

• Masalah kehilangan data input ketika bekalan elektrik terputus. Kerap sangatkah bekalan elektrik anda terputus dalam masa sehari? Lagi satu, anda juga boleh gunakan notepad untuk simpan suntingan anda kiranya internet terlalu lambat.

• Bayangkan ada orang lain menyunting laman yang juga sedang disunting oleh anda, tapi dia guna cara satu suntingan besar dalam sekali simpan. Dia sudah selesai menyunting dan apabila dia sudah habis menyunting berlaku penyanggahan suntingan pada laman tersebut di mana anda telah melakukan banyak simpanan suntingan. Dia akan periksa sejarah untuk menyesuaikan suntingannya dengan suntingan anda, tapi kalau terlalu banyak suntingan yang anda simpan, maka susahlah dia.

• Saya tidak pasti anda faham atau tidak tentang apa yang saya cuba sampaikan, tapi harapnya anda faham. Dan jika dibandingkan saya dengan anda, anda lebih dekat kepada orang yang gila jumlah suntingan. Kalau anda perasan, saya buat satu lema dalam sekali sunting. Saya akan sunting jika ada kesalahan sahaja. Sila jadi pengguna bijak dan bertolak ansur. Sekian. Kurniasan 22:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 20:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hi, it keeps me in deep curiosity over your edits in Wikitionary. I am actually amazed with your commitment in Wikitionary since many of us focus mainly on Wikipedia. Why are your edits only focus on Wiktionary? Do you have plans to edit in Wikpedia? Diagramma Della Verita 14:37, 12 Disember 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 10:20, 13 Disember 2008 (UTC)

The Malay WP started with a small group and it is still a small group but we have achieved 20,000 articles in a period of five years. I am sure WikiKamus will be able to expand with your contributions. Perhaps I might get myself involve with this but dictionary entries just isn't my type. Later. Diagramma Della Verita 09:25, 14 Disember 2008 (UTC)

I have replied it into your talk page. ~ON·W·HEE·Z·IER·P·L·OT~ 11:28, 17 Disember 2008 (UTC)